Over the last number of weeks, a lot of people have reached out to clergy asking for “religious exemptions” from mandatory vaccination requirements at work or school. While there are many theological understandings on this issue, it seems appropriate to take a look at this from a Jewish perspective.
The first thing to understand is that Judaism is not monolithic. There is an old saying that two Jews equals three opinions, four rabbis, and five synagogues. Because there is no hierarchy in Judaism (unlike the Catholic tradition of the Pope and Cardinals), each Jewish community is able to make decisions based on its interpretations of sacred texts. There can be “an” opinion, but no rabbi can claim “the” opinion. I also want to be clear that both my wife and I are vaccinated, and my personal opinion is that adults be vaccinated if they are medically able, based upon the Jewish concept of pikuach ha’nefesh: that saving a life is of paramount importance as a Jewish value.
The current challenge theologically is not whether vaccines are good or bad, but whether they should or can be mandated based upon Jewish law.
There are a few powerful reasons that mandatory vaccinations are potentially antithetical to Jewish philosophy. The first is a historical concern. The “yellow stars” that Jews were forced to wear in Nazi Germany segregated us from the rest of society. While many think this was a Nazi concept, it actually goes back to the eighth-century caliphates, who demanded yellow stars on Jews because they believed that Jews carried diseases and so should be separated from general society. The concept of segregating any group of people, of marking them, and of justifying it based on health reasons is a painful history that Jews have experienced, culminating in the concentration camps.
There is also the inherent challenge in basing any public policy on “science,” a practice that has historically never resulted in anything positive for society. Jews and all people of faith base their decisions upon sacred texts, which are eternal. By definition, science is always growing and changing as we learn more; and so it is dangerous to determine public policy on science. The 18th-century zoologist Carl Linnaeus determined that the “African race” (as opposed to those from Europe) were “sly, lazy, cunning, lustful, careless, and governed by caprice.” His “science” proved that Asians were “severe, haughty, greedy, and ruled by opinions,” whereas the Europeans were “gentle, acute, inventive, governed by laws.”
This “scientific racism” was extended by Christopher Meiners (1747-1810), whose science demonstrated without a doubt that “negroes… feel less pain than others” and are “without emotion.” These and other “scientists” like them paved the way for justifying slavery. If those of African descent were less than human, then there was no reason not to treat them differently and even enslave them. And In 1912, Henry Goddard “scientifically” tested immigrants at Ellis Island and determined that 87 percent of Russians, 83 percent of Jews, 80 percent of Hungarians, and 79 percent of Italians were “feeble minded and had a mental age of less than 12.” His scientific proof was the foundation for the Immigration Act of 1924, restricting American immigration. Basing policy on the science of the time consistently leads to societal challenges.
While saving a life is of supreme importance in Judaism, many people have legitimate concerns over the long-term effects of this vaccination, especially with regard to children. So are there religious reasons to reject mandatory COVID vaccinations from a Jewish perspective that are also applicable to Christians?
The simple answer is yes, based upon two theological principles. The first is “free will,” a concept that is primary in Jewish theology, taking its roots in Deuteronomy 30:19-20. Maimonides (1138-1204), in his codification of Jewish law and belief, argues strongly for the primacy of individual responsibility (Laws of Teshuvah 5:2), and it is, therefore, the responsibility of every individual to make a personal decision to vaccinate or not. God gives us the opportunity to make choices, and we need to do so responsibly based on our own personal beliefs.
The other aspect that can come into play is “shalem bayit,” “peace in the house.” Judaism places a huge value on the relationship between husband and wife. We are taught that after Eve ate the forbidden fruit, Adam ate it as well in order to honor the relationship with his wife, even though he knew it was directly forbidden by God. From this act of Adam, we learn that if one’s spouse directly opposes the vaccination of his or her partner, the partner should not vaccinate. In the same way that a wife would not get breast augmentation without her husband’s agreement, nor a man get a vasectomy without his wife’s support, this religious concept of shalem bayit would prohibit a spouse from getting a vaccination if the husband or wife was not supportive.
Again, it is important to express that my wife and I are vaccinated, our children have all of the typical child vaccinations, and I support COVID vaccinations for adults. But making any vaccination mandatory as part of public policy is antithetical to Jewish practices as many rabbis understand them.
Judaism is not theologically monolithic, and each community has its own interpretation and understanding of halacha (Jewish law) and minhagim (customs). It is the position of each spiritual community to determine its own interpretation of how to respond to mandatory vaccinations. But if the spiritual community and leadership sides with the above understandings of Jewish law, mandatory vaccinations cannot be enforced upon any community member subject to the rights under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and 42U.S. Code § 2000a – “Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation.”
If you are searching for other resources regarding COVID vaccinations, I suggest going to www.ForUnitedSolutions.org, which is a great resource and support system for those seeking exemptions. If you wish to get vaccinated, all Rite Aid stores offer free vaccinations.
Most importantly, we must all respect each other’s choices, and especially support our friends and colleagues who disagree with our own opinions regarding this issue. Each individual needs to make his or her own decision on this issue based on an understanding of the information available. We cannot and must not allow this issue of vaccination to divide our community and nation. Rather, like the sages of ancient times, we must respect each other’s individual decisions, especially when we disagree. Instead of letting the issue divide us, let us all develop a deeper respect for each individual’s choice.
Rabbi Michael Barclay is the Spiritual Leader of Temple Ner Simcha and the author of Sacred Relationships: Biblical Wisdom for Deepening Our Lives Together.
Gracias querido Rabino Michael Barclay,
Aunque soy católica, comparto sus reflexiones, además no me vacunaré, pues baso mi decisión en mi respeto a la vida y no puedo avalar el negocio del aborto al ser un ingrediente de las vacunas de ARNm , el libre albedrío, el derecho natural, y sus reflexiones me dan luz y esperanza, que esta ceguera que genera divisiones entre hermanos terminará pronto, Dios nos creo a su imagen y semejanza, y nos ha colmado de su amor, para que a la vez nos comportemos como hermanos y sobretodo hijo de Dios.
reciba muchas bendiciones y que se multipliquen para su familia e hijos
Dios con nosotros
Two of the main tennants of Judaism are to “Love your neighbor as yourself.” and doing what we can to “repair the world.” The responsibility involed here is care for one’s neighbora, as in the responsibility for not spreading a virus that has killed indiscriminately around the world. Most of the people now in hospitals in the U.S., and those who are the sickest, are people who have not been vaccinated.
I understand questioning the speed with which the vaccines were developed, with Trump’s “Warp Speed” program. When I heard that, I was not sure about taking it, until I found out how they did it. For the last 10-12 years they have been working on the new technology of mrna for being able to quickly develop vaccines. The companies also sped up testing by running stage 1, 2, and 3 testing simultaneously, not consecutively, like they would normally do. That was how we got viable, safe vaccines.
Vaccines have been required for years. Children must have numerous vaccinations to attend school. Members of our armed services must be vaccinated for certain assignments. People traveling to certain countries are required to be vaccinated, as are people coming to the U.S. So why is this vaccine so different. It is not anti-Jewish, and not anti-Christian to get vaccinated. But it is irresponsible, and un-patriotic to not get vaccinated.
When President Trump caught COVID-19, he was treated with monoclonal antibodies. When the vaccines were ready, President Trump got vaccinated. So it must not be anti-Republican to get vaccinated. Let’s take care of each other.